|
Post by bizzemFrog on Jan 13, 2006 20:29:20 GMT -5
Hey Jack, I am here to give you credit even when you don't give yourself any. *If you are bitter Jay, stop reading* On the last pod cast (the 23rd Psalm) you give BJ another tally because the we finally saw the munster. What we saw in the episode was a cloud of smoke, and when we saw inside the munster we got a glimpse into Eko's past. My point being that when you claimed that the munster was an illusion, it seemed to me that you were more or less saying that the munster is not a T-rex. or huge beast. And it is not those things. Further more when I wrote in and backed up your theory with some analysis about the nature of the Dharma experiments you agreed that the munster was a device used to scare the people, but not actually a real monster. It clearly is a device used to scare people, and is not a big scare animal like people assumed. I think that the score should be not be 5 to 3 but instead 4 to 4. Or at the very least, because the munster is neither big and scary nor an illusion this one should be a draw making the score 3 to 3. Don't know why I care at all John aka bizzemfrog
|
|
|
Post by schuhss on Feb 2, 2006 3:26:36 GMT -5
First post and it'll be used to support Outstanding Jack against the Bitter Imagination Deprived Jay about this tally thing. Considering the risk Jack takes with his amazing theories and the fact that he tries to keep them coherent I think that he should get 2 points each time one of his theories is confirmed. I mean BIDJ is just jumping from theory to theory, most of the time taking the safe side by saying that Jack's wrong. I think it would be fair to do a global recount of all the ballots and give Jack two points when his theory is right and only one point to Jay when Jack's theory is proved to be wrong. Please excuse my bad english, you should be glad I spared you an audio comment and my awful accent.
|
|