Post by nctrnlbst on Mar 3, 2006 7:32:18 GMT -5
The more that I think about it, the more I am certain that it is impossible to logically explain the crash. Every time that I tried to think of a reasonable explanation to an aspect of the crash, I would soon realize that it would contradict another. There are just too many variables to consider. There many questions that would need answering if the crash wasn’t staged, and even more if it wasn’t
1. It is virtually impossible for anyone to survive a plane crash where the plane broke into three sections at 70,000 feet. The Mythbusters experiment I sited above, would only apply if the plane were intact. If the plane broke into pieces, the pilot would not be able to guide the plane in at all. A plane that was broken into pieces would literally shatter upon impact.
2. If the crash were not staged, it would be virtually impossible for anyone to survive given the nature of the crash (i.e. the plane breaking apart in mid-flight)
3. If it were assumed that everyone on the island was chosen to be on the island, then how would the Initiative assure that the people that they wanted to survive, survived?
4. Why would the Initiative risk the chance of the people, whom they obviously went through a lot of trouble for, dying?
5. Why would they place the children with the other survivors, only to kidnap them a day later? Why not just take them while setting up the crash, and allow the others to just assume that they died?
Please feel free to post any other reasons that you may thing of.
1. It is virtually impossible for anyone to survive a plane crash where the plane broke into three sections at 70,000 feet. The Mythbusters experiment I sited above, would only apply if the plane were intact. If the plane broke into pieces, the pilot would not be able to guide the plane in at all. A plane that was broken into pieces would literally shatter upon impact.
2. If the crash were not staged, it would be virtually impossible for anyone to survive given the nature of the crash (i.e. the plane breaking apart in mid-flight)
3. If it were assumed that everyone on the island was chosen to be on the island, then how would the Initiative assure that the people that they wanted to survive, survived?
4. Why would the Initiative risk the chance of the people, whom they obviously went through a lot of trouble for, dying?
5. Why would they place the children with the other survivors, only to kidnap them a day later? Why not just take them while setting up the crash, and allow the others to just assume that they died?
Please feel free to post any other reasons that you may thing of.
