|
|
Post by bakersdozen on Feb 9, 2006 10:16:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Danielle on Feb 9, 2006 10:21:00 GMT -5
No...way. I'll believe it when I see it. Right now, I can't see that happening any time soon.
|
|
|
|
Post by addboy on Feb 9, 2006 10:24:14 GMT -5
I'm not seeing it.....where does it say that?
|
|
|
|
Post by addboy on Feb 9, 2006 10:25:14 GMT -5
I see Sawyer and Kate doing the deed before Kate and Jack.
|
|
|
|
Post by Annie on Feb 9, 2006 10:27:22 GMT -5
I don't believe it. This week's offical Lost podcast has an interview with Evangeline Lilly. She says it would be inconsistent with her character's nature to become romantically attached to anyone, esp. someone she's only known for a month and a half. Kate has trust issues and the urge to run away all the time.
Sawyer told her last night, "You have to run. . . a tiger can't change it's stripes."
|
|
|
|
Post by bakersdozen on Feb 10, 2006 11:36:07 GMT -5
No, I don't beleive it either. I just thought it was strange that was on Wikipedia, which is typically a pretty reliable source.
|
|
|
|
Post by addboy on Feb 10, 2006 11:52:42 GMT -5
I still don't see where it says it, anyone want to help me.
|
|
|
|
Post by matt on Feb 10, 2006 13:06:18 GMT -5
I'm not sure, but I can see Kate viewing Sawyer's betrayal so that she places him alongside her stepfather. I don't think she'll be having to much to do with him anytime soon, besides perhaps entreating him to leave the Dark Side.
|
|
|
|
Post by addboy on Feb 10, 2006 13:07:43 GMT -5
Who knows, maybe Jack and Kate get caught up in the moment...it happens...
|
|
|
|
Post by addboy on Feb 10, 2006 13:08:00 GMT -5
Maybe she'll see another black horse....
|
|
|
|
Post by Firebert on Feb 11, 2006 13:32:24 GMT -5
No, I don't beleive it either. I just thought it was strange that was on Wikipedia, which is typically a pretty reliable source. In the long run wikipedia is pretty reliable, but it is completely open, so anyone can add anything they want, which leads to pranks such as this. I don't see it happen. Wikipedia isn't a reliable source, even though most of what it says is true, it's not a proffesional encyclopedia, and so can't be truly reliable Heh, i have been smitten, i wonder what that was for. |
|
|
|
Post by bakersdozen on Feb 11, 2006 18:11:30 GMT -5
That's why I said typically...I know they edit out stupid stuff, since anyone can post to it and all. So that's my theory for what that was.
|
|
