|
|
Post by Blaw on May 24, 2006 12:00:12 GMT -5
o wow i got no clue... i would go look it up but that would be cheating......again
|
|
|
|
Post by Casey D on May 24, 2006 12:11:17 GMT -5
can I give a hint or is that against the rules?
|
|
|
|
Post by MiTHRANDiR on May 24, 2006 12:37:53 GMT -5
It's totally up to you if you wanna give a hint or not  |
|
|
|
Post by Casey D on May 24, 2006 12:54:21 GMT -5
alright the hint,
its the same speed at which film is shot...(dont know if that helps any)
|
|
|
|
Post by MiTHRANDiR on May 24, 2006 12:58:16 GMT -5
Not for me at least  |
|
|
|
Post by Blaw on May 24, 2006 13:23:40 GMT -5
sorry that doesnt help me much either
|
|
|
|
Post by Casey D on May 24, 2006 13:37:39 GMT -5
ok another, again i dont know how much it will help
its frames per second (fps) so if you know about cameras or film fps should be a big clue
|
|
|
|
Post by MiTHRANDiR on May 24, 2006 13:42:17 GMT -5
I still have no clue.  |
|
|
|
Post by Blaw on May 24, 2006 13:44:50 GMT -5
how about 42 fps? or 23?
|
|
|
|
Post by sporty502 on May 24, 2006 13:55:22 GMT -5
1/2000 is that right?
|
|
|
|
Post by MiTHRANDiR on May 24, 2006 13:55:35 GMT -5
Or perhaps 15? or 16? |
|
|
|
Post by Casey D on May 24, 2006 14:07:25 GMT -5
blaw you were very close actually with one of the numbers
|
|
|
|
Post by MiTHRANDiR on May 24, 2006 14:08:34 GMT -5
24?
|
|
|
|
Post by sporty502 on May 24, 2006 14:11:21 GMT -5
hey ok then 1/50
|
|
|
|
Post by Casey D on May 24, 2006 14:13:23 GMT -5
mithrandir you got it
the panasonic dvx100b is one of the only camcorders under $5,000 that can shoot 24 frames per second
|
|
